The
Australian version of Undercover Boss
lasted just one season; however, the U.K., U.S. and Canadian versions are
seemingly having a strong run. For those who haven’t seen the show, it is a
reality-type series where “each episode
features a high-positioned executive or the owner of a corporation going
undercover as an entry-level employee in their own company. The executive
changes appearance and assumes an alias and fictional back-story. The
fictitious explanation for the accompanying camera crew is that the executive
is being filmed as part of a documentary about entry-level workers in a
particular industry. They spend approximately one week undercover, working in
various areas of the company's operations, with a different job and in most
cases a different location each day.”[1]
During the show the producers regularly cut to an interview with the
CEO away from the staff, where the CEO expresses how hard some job is, how they
haven’t worked this hard in a long time or how they are surprised that
processes are not working as expected. At the end of the show, the workers are summonsed
to the head office, where the executive enters the room out of disguise, comes
clean and introduces themselves to the people they have worked with. The executive
discusses in a genuine manner what great people these workers are and gives
away some rewards as recognition for their efforts in the business.
Initially,
I found it difficult to accept the basic premise of the show. How could such a
situation exist, and how come people do not recognize the bosses, considering
the really bad wigs they are wearing? The disguises are so fake.
I wondered, How
real is this when there are so many cameras around; surely the ruse had to get
out—but apparently not. Clearly, the behaviour we see is not what normally
happens without cameras in these businesses. I think it is the Heisenberg uncertainty
principle which states that a condition is changed purely by the fact that it is
being observed. Clearly, this would be at play in these situations?
But then I got thinking, are there any points in this show that we
could learn from? If you think about it, there are some real gems. Consider the
following lessons from the series:
·
Shows
that not enough executives shop their business.
My experience in owning my own business and
in consulting for both public and private companies shows that there are many
situations where the senior executives do not have a feel for what really
happens in the business or do not understand the exact experience their
customers face.
·
Clearly
demonstrates communication channels that don’t work.
Often, the series
will show situations where the head office would distribute or mandate, for
example, marketing material or new recipes, only for the owner to find out that
the use of these materials is not as expected. This problem highlights the
criticality of communications within the business: to keep everyone on the same
page.
·
Reminds
staff that there are executives out there who care about their people.
Some of the final
sections of the show are a touch corny, but there are also many touching
moments. Many of the owners on the show are genuine in their feelings towards
their staff, and it reminds us that not all bosses or owners are coldhearted
towards their employees. There are owners in business that sincerely care for
their staff.
·
Reminds executives
how important staff are to a company.
Likewise, the show also reminds everyone that
companies are made up of people, who are critical to the success of the
operation and shouldn’t be taken for granted. For the owners, the show
highlights a new level of appreciation for how hard some of the jobs are that
people have to perform every day. Owners are often reminded of how dedicated
many staff members are.
·
Reminds
everyone the employees are real people, each battling difficulties.
Many of the employees
in each episode have some major challenge they have been facing throughout
their lives. For some, it is a relative with a major illness like cancer; for
others, they might have been brought up in a broken home; and for the rest, it
might be a wayward past, and they are seeking redemption. The show reminds us that
everyone has stuff to deal with on a daily basis and that support in those
areas can be a huge motivator.
·
Reminds
us of the power of well-targeted rewards.
While the rewards at
the end of the show couldn’t be provided to all of the staff in the organisation,
the personal impact these rewards have on the individuals involved is clearly
demonstrated by the seemingly genuine emotions portrayed. (It would be
difficult for the show to get the high level of emotion shown from normal
everyday people who are not actors.) The emotional impact of these rewards should
be a reminder to everyone of how important it is to recognise the effort the staff
puts in.
·
Reminds
us that personal rewards make a bigger impact.
Rather than simple pay
raises, personal rewards are most effective. While some employees on the show are
clearly underpaid for the value they bring to the company, and they are
grateful for the raise, it is the rewards focused on family that make the
biggest impact.
·
Reminds
us that there are always areas to be improved.
Also, the best ideas come from those who do the
work. Many of the episodes have the boss walking away with new ideas about how
things can be done. This has been an old source of improvement—ask those who do
the work. Not enough companies do this.
Copyright © 2015 by David Ogilvie. All rights reserved.
David Ogilvie
is a global expert in profit improvement and maximising ERP investments.
Contact Details:
David Ogilvie
Phone: +61 (0)438 787 759
Email: david@davidogilvie.com.au
No comments:
Post a Comment